<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Rettstatt &#187; sony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rettstatt.com/blog/tag/sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rettstatt.com/blog</link>
	<description>transmedia storyteller and youth media specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sony and Children&#8217;s Privacy</title>
		<link>http://rettstatt.com/blog/2008/12/sony-and-childrens-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://rettstatt.com/blog/2008/12/sony-and-childrens-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rettstatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children's privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coppa coppr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rettstatt.wordpress.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Sony is paying $1 Million for violating the Children&#8217;s Online Privacy Protection Rule. It wasn&#8217;t any sort of evil white-collar schemy crime. They didn&#8217;t launder money or engage in insider trading. Like a surprising lot of companies, they just didn&#8217;t bother to bother the experts. In this case, children&#8217;s online community experts. They demonstrated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, <a title="Sony Dinged $1 Million for Child-Privacy Breach" href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/12/sony-dinged-1-m.html">Sony is paying $1 Million</a> for violating the Children&#8217;s Online Privacy Protection Rule.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t any sort of evil white-collar schemy crime. They didn&#8217;t launder money or engage in insider trading. Like a surprising lot of companies, they just didn&#8217;t bother to bother the experts. In this case, children&#8217;s online community experts. They demonstrated a profound lack of rigor.</p>
<p>The thing wasn&#8217;t that they collected email addresses. There are ways to do that legally without jumping through too many hoops. And it wasn&#8217;t that they pshawed the COPPA Commandments. The mistake, at the simplest level, was <em>asking for date of birth</em>. That tiny little drop-down doohickey provided the &#8220;actual knowledge&#8221; that did them in.</p>
<p><a title="United States of America (For the Federal Trade Commission), Plaintiff, v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, a general partnership subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, Defendant (United States District Court For the Southern District of New York), Case No. 08 CV 10730 (LAK)" href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823071/index.shtm">There&#8217;s more to it</a>, of course. And a company like Sony should be just as invested in best practices as they are in the law, and best practices for them would start with the acknowledgment that kids are going to be visiting their music websites and they&#8217;d better face that fact head on.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they went out shortly and recruited themselves a Czar to wear the thinking cap on this sort of thing from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rettstatt.com/blog/2008/12/sony-and-childrens-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

